San Diego-based licensed clinical psychologist named Trayce Hansen, who attempted to portray marriage equality as somehow dangerous to children.
word got to Dr. Thomas Marra, also a practicing clinical psychologist and author, who decided he couldn't let Hansen's diatribe sit out there unchallenged.
here's the wisdom of Dr. Trayce Hansen:
Love Isn't Enough: 5 Reasons Why Same-Sex Marriage Will Harm Children.
First, mother-love and father-love–though equally important–are qualitatively different and produce distinct parent-child attachments.
Secondly, children progress through predictable developmental stages.
Third, boys and girls need an opposite-sexed parent to help them moderate their own gender-linked inclinations.
Fourth, same-sex marriage will increase sexual confusion and sexual experimentation by implying all choices are equally acceptable and desirable.
And fifth, if society permits same-sex marriage, it also will have to allow other types of marriage.
Response from from Dr. Thomas Marra:
Dr. Hansen's reasoning is flawed on 4 fundamental points. First, she engages in sexism by presuming that mothers are primarily permissive and fathers are primarily limit setters.
There is nothing preventing a male from performing similar functions.
Third, Dr. Hansen draws upon the developmental aspects of a child's growth to predict that an infant needs a mother more and an older child needs a father more.
These functions are not gender specific. A father can soothe a child, and a mother can provide disapproval for dangerous and inappropriate behavior. It is the skill of the parent in matching guidance and nurturance behaviors to the developmental needs of the child that predict success. This again is not gender specific. It is skill specific.
Lastly, Dr. Hansen begs the question when she posits that same-sex parents will increase the sexual confusion of the child they raise. Her argument presumes that sexual orientation is a lifestyle choice made by individuals based upon learning experiences in society. The research does not support this notion.
Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning, Inter-sexed and Allies (GLBTQIA). Operated by a homosexual providing news and more intended for the above mentioned audience.
Friday, October 19, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Alternately, you may click the button below, fill out the form, and the voicemail system will call you.
This site may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is available in effort to advance understanding. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
1 comments:
Oh, there are so MANY reasons why none of "Dr." Hansen's crap doesn't hold water.
Sure - mother-love and father-love are different, but NO two individuals love a child the same, regardless of gender. My daughters' aunts, for example, all give the girls different kinds of love - it's STILL LOVE...
I don't understand the point of the second "argument" of children passing through predictable developmental stages. Are queer parents somehow less equipped to handle those stages than straight ones are?! I know MY kids didn't come with instructions - I'm figuring this shit out as I go, just like everyone else is...
The third point is just dumb. Is there anyone on the planet (except, perhaps, those being raised in monestaries or nunneries) who DOESN'T have exposure to both genders in their lives? I can tell you with 100% certainty that I'm not my daugters' only female role model...
The fourth point is the one that made me snort because, of course, straight parents ALWAYS raise ONLY straight kids - and who says that all choices AREN'T equally acceptable and desirable?!
The fifth point is just plain stupid. I remember listening to an NPR show a few years ago about same-sex marriage, and Diane Rehm allowed a caller on who railed about the slippery slope of gay marriage and how, pretty soon, people will be marrying their mothers or their dogs or their toasters (he actually proposed human-toaster marriage. I thought he lacked imagination in his choice of appliances, but that's neither here nor there). It's amazing how terrified some people are of love....
Sorry to ramble - this stuff chaps my hide....
Post a Comment